
Benji Horwell
Senior Advisor
Do you know which risk factor contributes to more deaths worldwide than obesity, alcohol and physical inactivity combined? Air pollution. Surprising, isn’t it?
These deaths are highly concentrated in high-polluting low and middle income countries such as China and India, but even in high income countries such as the UK and the US, air pollution is still one of the top 10 risk factors.
The tragic death of Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah – caused, in part, by excessive exposure to air pollution – prompted a UK Government review into air quality information which was published earlier this month.
The report’s findings and many of the recommendations chime with insights from behavioural science and our own EAST framework, such as the need for air quality communications to “use accessible language” and for resources to be “be created and/or endorsed by trusted messengers”.
Better information is an important part of reducing air quality harms, but if we want to make real progress this needs to be complemented by a wider set of interventions to tackle the causes of air pollution.
Below we feature some examples from our own and others’ work to show how behavioural science can be part of more ‘upstream’ solutions.
Fossil-fueled transportation is one of the largest contributors to air pollution worldwide, so encouraging people to switch to less polluting forms of transport can make a big dent on air quality. Our recent work with Uber (see image below) demonstrated that, with the right incentives, many people can make do without their car. We’ve also shown that with timely and social nudges, we can encourage people to consider more sustainable forms of transportation and to adopt electric vehicles in place of their petrol or diesel vehicle.
We recently worked with the London Borough of Merton to reduce idling at a level crossing. The previous sign was a static message encouraging drivers to turn off their engines. Our intervention was a simple electronic sign (see below) designed to grab drivers’ attention by only lighting up when the crossing barriers were down and highlighting the financial benefits of switching off their car engine. After the new sign was installed, we observed a 13 percentage point increase in the number of drivers switching off their engine, which we estimated would lead to an extra 2,000 drivers switching off their engines at the level crossing every month.
Encouraging consumers to choose ‘collection’ instead of home delivery can reduce emissions from delivery vans. We worked with Impact on Urban Health and Centre for London to test choice architecture nudges in a simulated online shopping environment, and found that a pro-environmental framing almost doubled the amount of collection choices compared to the control condition. Collection is typically cheaper for online retailers, so this type of nudge represents a potential win-win for industry and government (so long as it does not affect the overall checkout conversion rate).
An innovative example of smart incentives comes from Gujarat, India, where a cap-and-trade market was used to encourage firms to reduce their emissions.
In a recent randomised controlled trial, factories in the treatment group were required to install emission monitoring systems and could pollute up to 80% of a set ‘cap’ for free.
They were then able to purchase and trade permits with other firms for the remaining 20%, giving them a direct financial incentive to reduce their emissions and find cost-effective ways to do so.
Crucially, those polluting above the permitted cap also incurred substantial fines, more than they would have paid to purchase the necessary permits.
Over two years, the intervention achieved a 20-30% reduction in particulate pollution compared to control firms who were subject to business-as-usual spot checks and fines.
It also reduced enforcement costs, showcasing how well-designed incentives can yield substantial environmental and financial benefits.
While most of Europe and North America already have emissions trading schemes, most developing countries do not (with the notable exception of China). Given that deaths from air pollution are concentrated in developing countries such as India, Indonesia and Egypt, it is crucial that interventions like these are introduced to help encourage industry to be part of the solution.
Behavioural science offers powerful, practical solutions to reduce air pollution – from nudging individual actions to designing smarter incentives. But real change requires collaboration.
If you’re a policymaker, business leader, or advocate, partner with us to create cleaner air and healthier communities. Get in touch today to make an impact.
Senior Advisor
Get in touch to see how our deep understanding of human behaviour and evidence-led problem solving can help you.
Get in touchDesign and development by Soapbox.